Journey to the National Master Title, Part 19

I scored 3/4 in the July 25, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado, gaining 12 rating points to lift my rating to 1944 while tying for first-third U2000. My daughter Rachel also played; she did not win a tournament game, but she had fun playing a lot of casual games in between rounds, and she won some of those.

I proudly wore my "Chess Dad" shirt when Rachel and I played in the July 25, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado
  

Rachel and tournament organizer Robert Chenault enjoyed a casual game before round two 

Rachel and I went to Grand Rapids to experience the whole week of the U.S. Open (August 3-9) plus the various invitational tournaments. I scored 4/8 in the Weeramantry National Tournament of State Champions speed chess (3+2) event. My first two wins were by forfeit, and my other opponents all had higher regular ratings than I do. I split my two game mini-match with Charlie Creswell, who tied for second-fourth in this event with 7/8. I drew a game with Landon Meadors, a 10 year old who went on to score 7/9 in the U.S. Open to earn the National Master title in style. My overall performance was solid, resulting in just a three point blitz rating loss to 1808.

I defeated FM Peter Bereolos in the first round of the Irwin National Tournament of Senior State Champions, and then I earned the second round upset prize for my win versus IM Tim Taylor, a 1977 U.S. Open co-champion. Chess Life Online mentioned my second round win in their U.S. Open coverage. In my game versus Taylor, my K boldly marched up the board, munching pawns along the way. Objectively, I was lost, but in time pressure he faltered by playing ...Bc5+??:

After Kc3, my K safely completed a tour from g1-g2-f2-f3-f4-f5-e4-d4, dodging enemy fire along the way! White is up three pawns, and now Black's K is exposed while White's K is safe behind a pawn armada. Taylor resigned 14 moves later.

I played very strong players in the remaining four rounds, losing to FM Steve Van Enk, GM Alonso Zapata, Expert Leonid Gavrysh, and NM Randy Canney, whose peak USCF rating was over 2400. My score of 2/6 is very respectable considering the opposition that I faced, and I gained 23 rating points to lift my rating to 1967.

Rachel and I played in the four day U.S. Open schedule, and we each took byes for the first two rounds. Our first four games were contested with a G/60 time control plus five second time delay. I scored 2/4 in those games. Our final three games were contested with a 40/100, G/30 time control plus 30 second increment. I scored 2/3 in those games to finish with 4/7 (5/9 overall including the two half point byes), losing 32 points to drop my rating to 1935. Overall, for the U.S. Open week I lost nine regular rating points, lost three blitz rating points, and created memories with Rachel that will last a lifetime. Rachel gained 16 rating points. The only down note is that for the first time in 2026 I lost to a player rated below 1800; my fifth round U.S. Open loss to a player rated 1587 is the main reason that I lost points instead of gaining points during an otherwise most enjoyable week of nearly nonstop chess. The week was not all about chess, though. Rachel and I went to several bookstores, and we toured the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum. Here is a picture of us in a room modeled after the White House Cabinet Room:

On August 22-23, 2026, I scored 3.5/5 in the U2100 section of the Indianapolis Open, gaining nine points to push my rating back to 1944. I won my first three games, drew in the fourth round, and turned down a draw in the fifth round before losing to end my bid for back to back Indianapolis Open U2100 titles (I won the 2025 event with 4.5/5). When my fifth round opponent offered a draw on move 16, I stood slightly better:

I declined the draw offer by playing ...Nxd5. Eight moves later, I was clearly winning:

 

The best move is 24...d5, when 25. Rxd5 loses to ...e3 followed by ...Rxd5 and ...Bxa3, winning the Exchange with a dominant position. 

Black wins after 25. cxd5 by playing ...Rxb5. If White plays Qxb6 then ...Rxb6 leaves Black up an Exchange. 

If in response to 24...d5 White plays 25. Qd4 (the move that concerned me during the game when I analyzed this position) then Black wins after 25...Rxb5 because of the threat of ...Bc5 pinning White's Q to his K on the long diagonal. I think that when I tried to calculate these lines during the game, I played two moves in a row for White and did not "see" that ...Bc5 wins in this line. Thus, instead of playing 24...d5, I played 24...e3, and after 25. Qe2 (the only move) Black is still clearly better but does not have an immediate forced win. On move 29, I blundered, and after a long fight I resigned on move 93.

On Saturday night, I scored 4/8 in the Indianapolis Open Blitz; two of my losses in the four round, double round format (i.e., you play one game with white and one game with black versus each opponent) were to Aidan Baker, a 13 year old National Master who scored 7.5/8 to take clear first before scoring 4.5/5 in the Major section to finish equal first with Grandmaster Semen Khanin.

This year, Robert Chenault organized the Ohio Chess Congress, which was held in Cincinnati for the first time since 2018. Chenault, Arbiter/TD Alan Hodge, and their team did an extraordinary job running this large event that had 279 players (including re-entries and house players) in six sections. My research about the history of the Ohio Chess Congress indicates that both the main event and the Ohio Chess Congress Blitz side event had a record number of participants. Attendance figures are not available for every year, but it is known that the 1972 Ohio Chess Congress--boosted by the "Fischer boom"--had a then-record 201 players, a mark surpassed in 1973 (209). The 1973 record stood until the 1987 OCC had 224 players. In most of the years since I started playing in the OCC in 1989, any number north of 150 was considered successful. 

This tournament traditionally happens on Labor Day Weekend, but this year it took place a week before Labor Day Weekend. I scored 1/5 in the Open (top) section, losing 21 rating points to drop my rating to 1923, and tying my worst score ever in this event; I also scored 1/5 in 1996. This marked my 32nd appearance in the Ohio Chess Congress over the five decades from the 1980s through the 2020s. IM Evan Park took clear first with 4.5/5, but as a Pennsylvania resident he is not eligible to be the Ohio champion. Sharath Radhakrishnan and Dalton Perrine tied for second-sixth overall with 4/5 and are Ohio co-champions. This is Perrine's second Ohio title in a row, while Radhakrishnan is one of the youngest Ohio champions ever; he was born in 2013, and the only Ohio champion who I can confirm to be younger is Kasun Waidyaratne (2004 co-champion born in 1992). The only other Ohio champions 15 or younger who my research has uncovered are Arjun Soni (2024 champion born in 2010) and Elton Cao (2019 champion born in 2004).

On Saturday night after round three, I scored 6/10 in the Ohio Chess Congress Blitz. GM Jianchao Zhou won the Ohio Chess Congress Blitz with 9.5/10, while Radhakrishnan finished clear second (top Ohio scorer) with 8/10. 

On September 26-27, 2026, I scored 4.5/5 to win the Ohio Senior Open for the second year in a row, joining Charles Diebert (2016-17, 2019) and Tom Britt (2021-22) as the only players to win the event more than once. This victory qualifies me to play in the 2027 Irwin National Tournament of Senior State Champions.

I gained 62 rating points to increase my rating to 1985. I won my first four games before a last round draw clinched clear first, which is the same route that I took to clear first in 2025. Here I am holding the 2026 Ohio Senior Open first place trophy while standing next to tournament organizer/tournament director Grant Neilley, who did his usual outstanding job making sure that everything ran smoothly:

The 2026 Ohio Senior Open continued the event's tradition of having a contest for the most interesting or unusual chess set, with the winners determined by anonymous polling of the tournament's participants. Steve Charles' display featuring a scoresheet signed by Bobby Fischer and Carlos Bielicki from their 1960 game at Mar del Plata won in the Staunton category. Here is a closeup of the signed scoresheet:

 Here is a chessboard showing an opening position from that game:

Here is a closeup of the move list:

Richard Hayes' wood and bone set won in the Figurine/Theme category:

This year, my rating has taken a roller coaster ride, soaring as high as 2072 in April and as low as 1923 in August. The challenge that I face is not figuring out how to play Master-level chess; the challenge that I face is figuring out how to consistently play Master-level chess. Prior to the Ohio Senior Open, I started utilizing some different training/preparation techniques, but before I say more on that topic I must prove that my performance in the Ohio Senior Open was the first step toward sustained rating growth. I have won the Ohio Senior Open before, and I have even gained more than 60 rating points in a tournament before, so the only way to prove that my training/preparation is working is to string together a series of tournaments with consistently positive results.

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 16, I listed four chess goals for 2026. Here are those goals, with notes about how I have performed so far this year:

1) Gain 25 rating points per quarter. I gained 83 rating points in the first quarter of 2026, improving my rating from 1980 to 2063; I lost 131 rating points in the second quarter of 2026, dropping my rating from 2063 to 1932; I gained 53 points in the third quarter of 2026, improving my rating from 1932 to 1985.

2) Do not lose more than eight games to players rated below 1800. I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2026; I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800 in the second quarter of 2026; I lost one game to players rated below 1800 in the third quarter of 2026.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had eight draws and eight losses in the first quarter of 2026; I had 12 draws and 15 losses in the second quarter of 2026; I had four draws and 12 losses in the third quarter of 2026.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .700. My winning percentage through the first three quarters of 2026 is .638.

In 2026, I have scored 71 wins, 24 draws, and 35 losses in regular rated tournament games with seven first place finishes in 29 events. I lost one game to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2026 is +5, so I need to gain 215 points to reach my goal.

Journey to the National Master Title, Part 18

I scored 2/3 in the Columbus Easter G/60 Swiss, gaining nine rating points to lift my rating to 2072, my highest rating since I had a 2080 rating in October 2022. I drew with top seeded NM Charles Diebert, but fell a half point short of first place finishers Alex Cretsos and Khalil Warfield, ending my streak of winning a prize in five straight tournaments.

I went into the Cincinnati Open feeling very confident after gaining 92 rating points so far this year, but I had a disastrous result in the FIDE Expert section, scoring just one win, one draw, and three losses. I lost 47 rating points to drop my rating to 2025. A statistician might call this "regression to the mean," but it can also be considered part of the deal for anyone who participates in a competitive sport; there are many very good chess players--including a lot of improving youngsters--so all it takes to have a bad result is being slightly off form. As the great Tex Winter told Kobe Bryant, "Everything turns on a trifle." Change a few moves from this tournament, and I could have had a much better result; of course, the same is true in reverse for the tournaments where I gained so many rating points recently. 

I bounced back by scoring 3/3 in the Dayton Chess Club's April 18, 2026 G/30 "A" Swiss, finishing clear first while gaining 11 rating points to lift my rating to 2036. Then I scored 3.5/4 in the April 19, 2026 East Market Swiss, tying for first-second while gaining 12 rating points to increase my rating to 2048. I captured first place in back to back tournaments on the same weekend for the first time since the weekend of April 6, 2024, when I tied for first in both the Columbus Plus Score tournament and the East Market Swiss.

I had a setback in the April 26, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado, scoring 2/4 and losing 16 rating points to drop my rating to 2032. I scored 2.5/4 in the May 2, 2026 Columbus Spring G/45 Open, losing six rating points to decrease my rating to 2026.

I scored 3.5/4 in the May 9, 2026 Dayton Chess Club G/30 Swiss, finishing first-fourth but losing two rating points to drop my rating to 2024. I completed a fun chess weekend by scoring 3/4 in the May 10, 2026 East Market Swiss, finishing second-fifth but losing one rating point to drop my rating to 2023.

I scored 4/7 in the U2100 section of the Chicago Open during Memorial Day Weekend, losing 24 rating points to drop my rating to 1999, the first time my rating has been below 2000 since February 2026. In recent years, my rating has dropped below 2000 soon after going above 2000, so perhaps a three month streak of maintaining a 2000-plus rating is a good sign, but in my absolute peak years I maintained a 2000-plus rating for 90 straight rating supplements (December 2009-May 2017), and that is the level of consistency that I need to regain in order to achieve my goal of obtaining the National Master title. I lost my first two games, won three in a row before losing in round six, and then I finished on a nice note by winning in round seven. It is frustrating that in the first two rounds I not only eliminated myself from prize contention but I lost so many rating points that even a strong finish could not fix all of the damage.

After the Chicago Open's fifth round, I scored 5/10 in the Chicago Open Blitz, including 0/4 versus players rated above 2200 and 5/6 versus players rated below 2000. There were 70 players in the Open section and 79 players in the U1900 section. 

I scored 2.5/4 in the May 30, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado, losing 10 rating points to drop my rating to 1989. 

I have had some excellent performances in the Cleveland Open--including finishing clear 1st in the U2000 section in 2009--but this year I lost to an 1834 rated player in the first round and never found my footing, scoring 2.5/5 in the U2100 section and losing 27 rating points to drop my rating to 1962. 

After round three, I played in the Cleveland Open Saturday Night Blitz, scoring 6/8 to finish clear first under 2100. I enjoy playing in rated blitz tournaments, and in Journey to the National Master Title, Part 6, I recounted my performance in the 2023 Cleveland Open Saturday Night Blitz (I did not play in the Cleveland Open Saturday Night Blitz in 2024 or 2025):

After the first three rounds of the Cleveland Open, I played in the Cleveland Open Saturday Night Blitz, scoring 5/8; I beat number one seed Wilson Spaqi (rated 2340) 2-0 in our mini match, and the only mini match that I lost was to National Master Jesse Ren, who won the event with an 8/8 score. I finished out of the money, but I added 16 points to my USCF blitz rating. Although blitz chess and regular rated chess are two different types of events--the former is like running a sprint, while the latter is like running a marathon--my ability to sandwich two wins against a strong National Master around tournament losses to players who each have ratings more than 200 points lower than my rating epitomizes the contrasting joys and frustrations of being a chess player: I know what it looks and feels like when my talent and preparation mesh, and I know what it looks and feels like when my talent and preparation do not produce the results that I expect. 

That paragraph summarizes how I feel about this Cleveland Open as well; chess is indeed a journey of "contrasting joys and frustrations."

I had a special Father's Day as my daughter Rachel and I played in the Cincinnati Sunday Chess G/60 event. I scored 1/3, losing 14 rating points to drop my rating to 1948. Rachel scored 2/3 (a one point bye, a second round loss, and a forfeit win in the last round). Rachel played an unrated G/60 game during the first round, and fought hard before losing against a much higher rated player. Despite the rating losses, we both had a great time. 

Rachel and I had fun on Father's Day at the Cincinnati Sunday Chess G/60 tournament 

Rachel and I played in the June 27, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado. I won my first round game in just 20 moves with Black, which enabled me to move up from board three in the Open section to board one in round two. The board one game each round is broadcast at lichess.com. I was better or winning for most of my second round game before I blundered and ended up down a R with no compensation. I won my third round game with Black, giving me the opportunity to notch a modest overall rating gain with a fourth round win, but again I blundered away a winning position with White to finish 2/4, losing 16 rating points to drop my rating to 1932. 

Here is my fourth round game prior to my 28th move:

White has an advantage of more than +6 according to Stockfish 18, which means that White is up the equivalent of more than a R even though the actual material advantage is one pawn. Black's only chance is to activate his R and B before White coordinates his R and N. I should have played 28. Rb3, which protects b2 while attacking b7. If Black checks on d2 then White's K goes to h3. During the game, I had a superficial concern that my K could get trapped or even checkmated on h3, but if Black tried to maneuver his R to h1 then White's K can escape via g2 if necessary. Unfortunately, I played 28. Na4, which does not spoil the win but which gives away a significant portion of White's advantage. My idea was to open up my R along the third rank while also defending b2 and attacking c5, but after 28...Rd2+ I erred by moving my K to g1 instead of h3. After my opponent played 29...Re2, I noticed that my intended move 30. Nxc5 loses to ...Be3+ followed by ...Bxc5. At this point, I should have slowed down and reevaluated the entire position to determine the correct plan. Instead, I played 30. Nb6, and Black could now equalize by taking my e pawn, but he blundered with 30...Rxb2??:

 

Now, the strongest move is 31. Nd7, with a double attack against c5 and e5. I played 31. Rd3, which is not as good but should still be sufficient to win. Black replied 31...Rd2. I had expected 31...Ra2, after which I planned to invade with my R and N to win pawns and help my K-side pawns advance. I should have realized that Black would attempt to thwart this plan instead of going after my a pawn. The only way to win after 31...Rd2 is to play 32. Rd7, forcing Black to trade Rs on my terms by activating my N to d7. Instead, I impatiently took on d2, activating Black's B on d2 and losing my a pawn by force. I know that a B is often stronger than a N in positions with pawns on both sides of the board because a B is a long range piece while a N is short range piece, so it is baffling and frustrating that I made such a rash decision. I could have still held a draw by moving my K toward the Q-side, but instead after Black took on a5 I took on e5, which misplaced my N and lost time. Black put his B on c3, attacking my N and controlling the a1 promotion square. I erred by moving my N to d3, after which neither my K nor my N can stop Black's a pawn. I could have offered more resistance by playing Nd7-b6 instead of Nd3, though Black is still clearly better because of his strong B and outside passed pawn.

Rachel scored 0/4; three of her four opponents outrated her by at least 300 rating points. She is having fun while learning and improving, even if her rating does not yet fully reflect what she has learned. Rachel played three casual games in between rounds, scoring one win, one loss, and one draw. Rachel has mentioned to me that she thinks about chess differently than I do, and I understand to mean not only that she evaluates moves differently than I do but also that she views chess as a fun game more than a challenge to be conquered.

When I started playing tournament chess I focused much more on the competitive aspect than the social aspect--and I am still more competitive than social, but going to tournaments with Rachel has brought out a different side of me and helped transform me into a more well-rounded person. 

Rachel and I took a selfie before going to the June 2026 Cincinnati Tornado. Yes, I wore the Chess Dad shirt for the second tournament in a row.

It is deeply ingrained in me to have ambitious chess goals and to believe that I am capable of achieving my goals, but I also see a bigger picture that chess provides value beyond gaining rating points. I knew this value long ago and spoke about it to others--including my students when I was a chess coach--but I am learning how to internalize it for myself and not let results alone determine how I feel about a chess tournament. I am not playing very well right now, but going to chess tournaments this summer with Rachel is a wonderful thing above and beyond how many games we win or lose. 

I have played 865 regular rated over the board games since January 1, 2020, and for most of that period my rating has hovered between the mid-1900s and the mid-2000s. Hall of Fame football coach Bill Parcells famously said, "You are what your record says you are." My record says that in recent years I am a high Class A/low Expert player. To reach my goal of attaining the National Master title, I have to break out of my current rating range. I have cut down my losses to players rated below 1800 and I have improved by draw/loss ratio, but that has not been enough, in part because many of my draws are with underrated kids so even though the draws do not hurt much in the tournament standings they are costing me rating points. I am also losing too many games to players rated between 1800-2000. My technique in converting winning positions has been lazy and sloppy, as illustrated by the above example.

I played very well in the first quarter of this year, but a disastrous second quarter not only wiped out an 83 rating point gain but put me in a deficit overall for the year. One major positive development this year is that my peak rating (so far!) of 2072 is my highest peak rating since 2022 and my 15th highest peak rating in a calendar year since 1987. 

The third quarter of 2026 will be about refocusing, regrouping, and getting my rating back over 2000. This is a challenging era for so-called "adult improvers" because the average USCF rating is much lower than it used to be and because the rating pool is increasingly populated with strong but underrated young players, but I believe that I am capable of playing well enough to overcome those challenges.

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 16, I listed four chess goals for 2026. Here are those goals, with notes about how I have performed so far this year:

1) Gain 25 rating points per quarter. I gained 83 rating points in the first quarter of 2026, improving my rating from 1980 to 2063; I lost 131 rating points in the second quarter of 2026, dropping my rating from 2063 to 1932. 

2) Do not lose more than eight games to players rated below 1800. I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2026; I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800 in the second quarter of 2026.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had eight draws and eight losses in the first quarter of 2026; I had 12 draws and 15 losses in the second quarter of 2026.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .700. My winning percentage through the first two quarters of 2026 is .663.

In 2026, I have scored 55 wins, 20 draws, and 23 losses in regular rated tournament games with six first place finishes in 24 events. I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2026 is -48, so I need to gain 268 points to reach my goal. 

Journey to the National Master Title, Part 17

I scored 1.5/4 in the January 10, 2026 Columbus Winter Open, losing 14 rating points to drop my rating to 1966. The key game happened in the third round when I battled top seeded NM Amogh Tripathi. After an interesting struggle, we reached this critical position with Black (Tripathi) to move:

 

He played 51...Rxf2??, which loses by force after 52.Rb6 Kd7 Otherwise Bb4 wins the pinned B. 53. Kd5 During the game, I missed that in this line my Bc3 prevents Black from checking my K with his R. This is an example of what GM Nikolai Krogius called "the retained image": when I visualized the position, I pictured Black's R being on f1, making ...Rd1+ possible. After 53...Be7 54. Rb7+ Ke8 55. Bxe5, White's powerful passed pawn and strongly centralized pieces are too much for Black to overcome.

Unfortunately, I quickly played 52. Rb2. My opponent replied 52...Rf3, and here I betrayed myself with a combination of excitement and relaxation. I was excited when I first noticed the Rb6 idea, and I relaxed because I thought that there was no way I could lose from here. I played 53. Rb6 and was dismayed after my opponent replied 53...Re3, winning my e pawn by force. I lamented not playing 53. Re2, after which the position is equal--but even after my imprecise 53rd move, White's pieces are still active enough to prevent defeat. I defended accurately despite drifting into time pressure. I enjoyed a time advantage for most of the game, but I had less than three minutes remaining when critical decisions still had to be made:

 

Here, Black has just checked my K. One move holds, and all other moves lose. I played 64. Kd1?? The drawing idea is to play 64. Ke1: if Black moves his K forward then White takes e4 with check and then slides the R back to e5 to pick up Black's last pawn. Black can take the Bc3 with his K in this line, but even if Black wins both of White's remaining pawns, R+B versus R is a book draw (and I held that draw in the second round of this tournament). My opponent erred with 64...e3 instead of playing 64...Kc4, giving me a chance to hold with 65. Re4 (preventing Black's K from advancing further)--but I played 65. h4??, after which 65...Kc4 leads to a forced win. Full credit to my opponent for his resourcefulness in time pressure; he played the last 20-plus moves of the game with two seconds left plus the five second time delay. Tripathi finished with 3.5/4 to claim clear first while I flamed out in the last round, eschewing a draw in an equal endgame before blundering and losing.

I bounced back to scored a solid 3/4 in the January 11, 2026 East Market Swiss, gaining five rating points to improve my rating to 1971. I was the fourth seeded player out of 14, and I finished clear second. I won my first round game versus Aadya Kakarla--the 25th highest rated 10 year old girl in the country--with a pretty checkmate in the middle of the board: 

My only loss was to top seeded NM Broderick Bauml, who took clear first with 4/4. Bauml obtained an advantage against me with Black in the second round, but after he lost his Q for two minor pieces and a P I had a decisive advantage, albeit in a complicated position. Bauml defended resourcefully even as his clock ticked below 30 seconds (G/45 time control with 10 second increment). I prosecuted my advantage effectively, but when my time dropped below three minutes I faltered. Here, my opponent has just played 57...Be7??

I replied with what should be a winning tactical blow: 58. Nxe5! My N is immune because of the threat of Qxe5+ followed by Qxe1, so my opponent played 58...Nxh4. I would have had a decisive advantage after 59. Nc6, but instead I played 59. Qc7??, enabling Black to create a blockade after 59...Nexf3+--but my opponent returned the favor with 59...Nf5?? and I answered with 60. f4. Now, if Black takes the Ne5 then White's connected passed pawns are powerful, and if Black does not eliminate the Ne5 then Nc6 followed by Qd7 and Nd8 gives White a winning attack. The game continued 60...Nc2 61. Nc6 Bf8 62. Nd8. The text is more than sufficient, but even stronger is 62. Qd7 followed by 63. Qe8, after which Black's blockade collapses.

We blitzed out several moves in mutual time pressure, and I recklessly sacrificed my N to get connected passed pawns, giving my opponent a winning advantage until he played 72...Nge3+??:

 

Now, 73. Kh1 holds the balance, but I instantly played 73. Kxh2 and lost my Q after 73...Bd6+. As I noted about my loss to Tripathi, I give full credit to Bauml for defending resourcefully for so long that I ended up in time pressure before committing the fatal blunder. National Masters often find a way to draw or even win despite making early mistakes, and that combination of tenacity plus tactical resourcefulness sets Masters apart from non-Masters.

I played well in the January 17-18, 2026 Queen City Open, scoring 3/4 to tie for third-sixth overall (and first-second U2200/U2000) while gaining 23 rating points to boost my rating to 1994. Highlights include drawing with Keya Jha (the second highest rated 11 year old girl in the country, 2150), and beating Joseph Kleban (2016) in the last round to avenge my last round loss to Kleban in the December 21, 2025 East Market Swiss. IM Ron Burnett and NM Aryan Balyan shared first place with 3.5/4. I have known Burnett since the late 1980s, and between rounds we had some interesting conversations about chess improvement. I told him about my attempt to earn the National Master title, a goal which he believes is attainable for me. Among other tips, he suggested that it is valuable to learn all of the basic checkmates "by hand"; it is not sufficient to be able to figure them out, because it is often the case that games are decided in time pressure. Even if a checkmate such as K+B+N versus K never comes up in one's games, learning that checkmate by hand improves one's understanding of how pieces coordinate. Burnett built his chess understanding in the late 1970s and early 1980s by playing countless training games against chess computers; he fine-tuned his chess understanding to the extent that he surged from the class ranks to well above National Master during a five year span.

I scored 4/5 in the January 31-February 1, 2026 Cardinal Open, finishing second-fifth in the U2200 section while gaining 19 rating points to lift my rating to 2013. I started out 3/3, setting up a round four game versus number one seeded NM Deshawn Kelley (2171), who was the only other player with a perfect score. I drew with Kelley, which meant that a last round win would clinch no worse than a tie for first, while a draw would clinch no worse than a second place tie. In the last round, I drew with Charithra Arvind (1827), the 19th highest rated 17 year old girl in the country, and Kelley won to claim clear first. This is the first time that I have not lost a game in consecutive two day classical tournaments; my combined score in the Queen City Open and the Cardinal Open is five wins and four draws. After round three, I played in the Cardinal Open Blitz, and I had my worst speed chess tournament result ever, going 0/7; in my previous over the board speed chess tournament at Kings Island in November 2025, I scored 6/8 to win the U2000 prize, so I was quite surprised to have this kind of "perfect score," particularly considering how well I am playing in classical chess. Classical chess and speed chess are similar, but it is fair to say that they are distinct sports to the extent that a player can do well at one and not do as well at the other without this being shocking, although the stark difference between 4/5 in classical and 0/7 in speed during the same weekend is surprising.

I started out 2/2 in the February 8, 2026 East Market Swiss, extending my unbeaten streak to 13 games--but then I lost in the third round to Joseph Kleban before squandering a winning position (and throwing away a simple draw) versus NM Broderick Bauml. I lost 11 rating points to drop my rating to 2002. 

I scored just 1/3 in the February 14, 2026 Columbus G/60 tournament, losing 22 rating points to drop my rating to 1980. After drawing my first two games, I declined a draw in round three before blundering and losing.

On February 21, 2026, I played in the second G/25+5 tournament held at the Kleptz YMCA in Englewood. I won the first event (held on December 20, 2025) with a 4/4 score, and I scored 4/4 this time, gaining 10 rating points to lift my rating to 1990. Rob Dennis of the Dayton Chess Society (the successor to the Dayton Chess Club) did an excellent job running the event, and he was also my last round opponent. I finished a successful chess weekend by scoring 3/4 in the February 22, 2026 East Market Swiss, tying for third-seventh and gaining eight rating points to improve my rating to 1998.

I scored 3/4 in the February 28, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado, gaining 10 rating points to push my rating back over 2000 (2008). I tied for third-ninth, and I won the U2001 prize (my official published February 2026 rating was 1994). 

In recent years, my rating fell below 2000 soon after I pushed it above 2000, so it felt great to score 4/4 in the March 8, 2026 East Market Swiss to gain 37 rating points and lift my rating to 2045, my highest rating since I had a 2060 rating in November 2022.

My daughter Rachel and I played in the March 15, 2026 Chess Earth Rapid tournament, a six round Quick-rated event featuring a G/15 +5 time control. I scored 4/6 to finish fifth-sixth, while Rachel scored 2/6 despite playing higher rated players in five of her six games. The player who beat me in the fifth round, Shashank Palla, scored 5/6 to take clear first place. His USCF Quick rating vaulted from 1519 to 1704. I lost 36 points to drop my Quick rating to 1939. Here are two pictures from the Chess Earth Rapid tournament (the second one shows one of the positions from a game that Rachel and I played on the oversize chess set after the tournament ended):

 

Rachel and I played in the March 19, 2026 Cincinnati Open Qualifier Quads, a Quick-rated event with G/24 with five second time delay time control. I scored 2/3 in the top quad to finish second, while Rachel scored 1/3 in the sixth quad. In the last round, I spoiled a winning position against top seeded Ashwin Kumar, playing an unsound sacrifice. Kumar is a promising junior player who is the 18th highest rated 12 year old (2134) in the United States. I gained seven points to lift my Quick rating to 1946.

I scored 3.5/4 in the March 28, 2026 Cincinnati Tornado, gaining 18 rating points to lift my rating to 2063, which is my highest rating since I had a 2080 rating in October 2022. I tied for first-second with top seeded NM Aryan Balyan, and I won the "Master Bounty" prize by drawing with Balyan in the last round. This is the third time that I won the Cincinnati Tornado "Master Bounty" ($100 for beating the top seeded Master, or $50 for drawing the top seeded Master): I drew with NM Pratik Shriwas (2378) in the July 30, 2016 Cincinnati Tornado, and I defeated NM Yuri Barnakov (2298) in the September 24, 2016 Cincinnati Tornado en route to finishing first-second and gaining 43 points to improve my rating to 2150. My rating has not been higher than 2100 since 2016. 

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 16, I listed four chess goals for 2026. Here are those goals, with notes about how I have performed so far this year:

1) Gain 25 rating points per quarter. I gained 83 rating points in the first quarter of 2026, improving my rating from 1980 to 2063.

2) Do not lose more than eight games to players rated below 1800. I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2026.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had eight draws and eight losses in the first quarter of 2026.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .700. My winning percentage through the first quarter of 2026 is .727.

In 2026, I have scored 28 wins, eight draws, and eight losses in regular rated tournament games with three first place finishes in 11 events. I lost 0 games to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2026 is 83, so I need to gain 137 points to reach my goal.

Journey to the National Master Title, Part 15

On July 17, 2025, my daughter Rachel and I played in the Cincinnati Chess Club's G/24 Swiss. This event only affected our USCF Quick ratings. I scored 3/4, tied for second-third, and gained 12 points to lift my USCF Quick rating to 1929. Rachel lost all four of her games, but she had a great time, and she played unrated casual games before and after the tournament.

The July 26, 2025 Cincinnati "Emotional Chess" Tornado had a record 88 players in three sections. I scored 3/4 to finish fourth-ninth in the Open section, gaining 14 points to push my rating to 1950, and splitting the U2001 prize with one other player. Rachel scored 1/4, including a bye for the first round; she played an extra rated game during the first round, and drew with a player rated 1400. Robert Chenault does a superb job organizing and directing these monthly events, and the way that he organized this particular event reminded me very much of the way that Martha Adams used to organize the Roosevelt Open. Adams made a point of honoring players for a variety of reasons, including youngest player, oldest player, player who traveled the farthest, and more; similarly, Chenault provided certificates, gift certificates, and other prizes to various players. I was honored to receive a Chess Earth Player Appreciation Award certificate plus $30 in Chess Earth merchandise gift certificates. 

Rachel and me before the first round of the Cincinnati "Emotional Chess" Tornado

  

My Chess Earth Player Appreciation Award

Unfortunately, in my next tournament I gave away all 29 rating points that I gained in my previous two tournaments. I scored just 2/5 in the U2200 section of the Joe Yun Memorial, and my rating plummeted back down to 1921. Last year in the Joe Yun Memorial, I played the two day schedule of the U2000 section with a first round bye, and I finished with 4/5 to tie for first-third while gaining 23 points to lift my rating to 2004. This year, I began poorly with a draw from a winning position in the second round (after taking a first round bye), and after I won my third round game versus a much lower rated player I lost both of my Sunday games. On Saturday night, I scored 3/7 in the Joe Yun Memorial Open Blitz; there were 14 players in the Open section and 10 players in the U1600 section.

On August 23-24, 2025, I scored 4.5/5 to claim clear first in the U2100 section of the Indianapolis Open. I gained 38 rating points to push my rating up to 1959. I won my first four games before a fighting draw in round five clinched first (though I had to wait for a favorable board two result to make sure that I had clear first and not a tie for first-second). Each of my wins lasted 40 moves or less, but my fourth round game was unusual because the tournament director stopped play after I made my 16th move; after a delay lasting more than 20 minutes, the tournament director forfeited my opponent, who apparently had been caught using his laptop during the game. My fourth round opponent was not ejected from the tournament, and he received a prize after winning his fifth round game. I believe that any player caught using an electronic device during a tournament should not only forfeit the game in progress but should be ejected from the tournament and ruled ineligible for a prize; that is the best way to not only ensure a fair outcome for the other participants but also to make it clear that there is no tolerance for cheating.

Here is the position after my second round opponent played 27.Kg1: 

I played 27...Bxf3 and my opponent resigned because of an unstoppable mate in three, but I had an even faster mate using just the minor pieces: 27...Nd3+ 28.Kf1 Bh3#. I don't recall ever seeing that mating pattern before, which is probably why I went for the more familiar mating pattern starting with my Q infiltrating the back rank after I eliminated the Bf3. 

On Saturday night, I scored 4/8 in the Indianapolis Open Blitz; two of my losses in the four round, double round format (i.e., you play one game with white and one game versus black versus each opponent) were to Justin Lee, a young Expert who scored 8/8 to finish clear first. 

I scored 2.5/5 in the Open Section of the August 30-August 31, 2025 Ohio Chess Congress, gaining 26 rating points to lift my rating to 1985. In the second round, I lost to FM Dalton Perrine, who tied for first-third with GM Alex Shabalov and IM Erick Zhao with 4.5/5. Perrine is the 2025 Ohio Chess Champion because Shabalov and Zhao are not from Ohio. In the third round, I beat 2024 Ohio Chess Champion Arjun Soni; here is the position after I played 45.Nec2:

Black's Q is imprisoned far away from the exposed Black K. My opponent had less than 30 seconds remaining (G/90 time control with 30 second increment) when he played 45...b5, a desperate attempt to create complications/distractions away from his K. The game concluded with 46.Qe3 f5 A draw offer accompanied this move, but my opponent was down to 15 seconds in a totally lost position, so I just kept playing. 47.exf5 bxc4?? A blunder in a lost position. 48.Qxe5+ Facing mate on the next move, my opponent resigned. After round three on Saturday August 30, I scored 3/7 in the Ohio Chess Congress Blitz. 

In my fourth round game versus Trey Modlin (rated 2182, but an NM because he has had a 2200 rating before), I achieved a winning position by move 22 before fumbling what should have been a simple conversion. Here is the position after my opponent played 23.Re1, a seemingly logical move that is a mistake: 

I should have played 23...Ncxe4 (the other N capture also wins) 24.Nxe4 Nxe4 25.Bxe4 Bxd5 26.Bxd5 Rxd5. Black is up a clean pawn, all of the minor pieces have been traded, and White has no meaningful counterplay. Instead, I played 23...Bxd5?, which gives away some but not all of my advantage. After 24.exd5, I should have played 24...Re8 25.Bg2 f6 26.gxf6 gxf6 27.Kh1 Kh8 with a clear edge but no forced win. Instead, I played 24...e4?, giving away most of my lead while weakening my Rd4 and my e pawn. After 25.Bg2, Stockfish 17 recommends the odd-looking 25...Na4 to break up White's powerful N tandem; objectively, Black is slightly better but from a practical standpoint Black has turned a decisive advantage into a mess where all three results are possible. Unfortunately, I did something much worse: after 25...Re8??, my opponent played 26.Qe3 and stood clearly better. My best chance now was to play 26...Nd3, giving up a piece but maintaining my advanced passed pawn, but instead I collapsed with 26...Nd7?? 27.Ne2, when White is winning easily in all lines.

I bounced back to win my last round game, but a fourth round win followed by a draw or win versus a higher rated player in the fifth round would likely have pushed my rating back over 2000. The self-inflicted wounds I suffer while playing chess are the most painful and difficult to accept. After FM Perrine outplayed me, I looked at the game and learned some things that I can apply in the future; all I can learn from the fourth round collapse is "Stop collapsing," which is a lesson that I should have already learned. It is the nature of this sport that sometimes such things happen, but such things happen more often to me than they should, and have prevented me from obtaining the long sought NM title that I am still chasing 30 years after I first achieved an Expert rating.

I have played in the Ohio Chess Congress 31 times in five different decades (1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, 2020s). The Columbus Trophy, which lists Ohio Chess Champions dating back to 1945, has been updated to include the names of the champions since 1995. John Lodger Hughes and I were co-Ohio Chess Champions in 2010, so my name is now on the trophy:

I scored 2.5/3 in the September 6, 2025 Columbus G/60 "Adults Only" tournament, an event limited to players who are at least 18 years old. I finished first-second and gained one point to inch my rating up to 1986. I was the third seeded player but the two top players were both upset in the first round so I was paired down in all three rounds. In my previous Columbus G/60 "Adults Only" tournament (February 15, 2025), I scored 2/3, lost five rating points, and did not win a prize. 

I scored 4.5/5 in the September 20-21, 2025 Ohio Senior Open, securing clear first by a full point over the rest of the field. This victory qualifies me to play in the 2026 Irwin National Tournament of Senior Champions. I gained 15 points to push my rating above 2000 (2001) for the first time since April 2025. In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 7, I recapped the 2023 Ohio Senior Open and described why this is a very meaningful tournament for me. I won a prize in each Ohio Senior Open from 2021-2023, and was poised to win a prize last year before squandering a winning advantage in my last round game, so winning this event for the first time was fitting redemption after my disappointing 2024 finish. Here I am posing with the 2025 Ohio Senior Open first place trophy:

Here is a picture of me with Grant Neilley, who has organized and directed the Ohio Senior Open since 2015:

The 2025 Ohio Senior Open continued the event's tradition of having a contest for the most interesting or unusual chess set, with the winners determined by anonymous polling of the tournament's participants. The "Middle East" and "Oriental" sets tied for first place.

 

 This set features pieces made in the Middle East

 

This set features an Oriental design

I scored 3/4 in the September 27, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado. I tied for third-sixth, and I won the U2001 prize. I gained one rating point to improve my rating to 2002, and I maintained a rating above 2000 for two tournaments in a row for the first time since April 2025. My second round loss to Siddarth Kunapuli (2062) snapped my 10 game streak of no losses, which started after my fourth round disaster versus Trey Modlin in the Ohio Chess Congress, but I bounced back to win my last two games.

Losing 52 rating points in the May 2025 Chicago Open was a major setback, but--as I have done each time in my chess career after my rating dropped below 2000--I have regained all of the lost rating points and more, pushing my rating back into Expert territory. The next steps in this journey are (1) maintain my 2000-plus rating with no more setbacks and (2) lift my rating over 2100 for the first time since 2016. 

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 12, I listed four chess goals for 2025. Here are those goals, with notes about how I performed in the first three quarters of 2025:

1) Gain 50 rating points per quarter. I lost 18 rating points in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing my rating from 2013 to 1995; I lost 59 rating points in the second quarter of 2025, decreasing my rating from 1995 to 1936; I gained 66 rating points in the third quarter of 2025, improving my rating from 1936 to 2002.

2) Do not lose more than six games to players rated below 1800. I lost five games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2025; I lost four games to players rated below 1800 in the second quarter of 2025; I lost zero games to players rated below 1800 in the third quarter of 2025.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had nine draws and 14 losses in the first quarter of 2025; I had nine draws and 15 losses in the second quarter of 2025; I had five draws and six losses in the third quarter of 2025.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .750, to break my personal record of .740 set in 2014. My winning percentage through the first three quarters of 2025 is .663. 

In 2025, I have scored 80 wins, 23 draws, and 35 losses in regular rated tournament games with six first place finishes in 34 events. I have lost nine games to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2025 is -11, so I need to gain 198 points to reach my goal. 

Journey to the National Master Title, Part 14

In five March 2025 tournaments, I finished first twice and second three times while scoring 15/19 with just two losses; in April I picked up where I left off by scoring 3/4 in the April 6, 2025 East Market Swiss, finishing second-sixth and gaining 18 rating points to push my rating to 2015. That is my highest rating since November 12, 2023, when my rating was 2032. In the third round, I defeated the top seeded player, National Master Deshawn Kelley, but then I lost in the fourth round to Siddarth Kunapuli; that defeat snapped a 13 game streak during which I had no losses, which is my longest such streak since I had a 13 game streak in February-March 2023. During my most recent streak, I had 10 wins and three draws, while during my 2023 streak I had nine wins and four draws. I believe that when I develop the necessary consistency to put together a streak of longer than 20 games without losses I will be well on my way to surpassing the 2200 rating barrier.

Last year, in Journey to the National Master Title, Part 10, I discussed my Cincinnati Open history: "I first played in the Cincinnati Open in 1994, and it has become one of my favorite (nearly) annual events. There have been a few years that it has not been held, and a few other years that I was not able to participate for various reasons, but this year marked my 14th appearance--and the sixth time that I won a prize (including a tie for first place in the U2100 section in 2013)." This year, I took a third round bye, which meant that I played two games on Saturday followed by two games on Sunday. I played kids in all four games, starting with a first round win and then alternating wins and losses the rest of the way to finish 2/4 (2.5/5 including the bye), losing 14 rating points to drop my rating to 2001. In the last round, I lost to Elizabeth Xia, the highest rated nine year old girl in the country; in this tournament, she gained 81 rating points to establish a new career-high rating of 1911. I would have tied for fourth if I had won my last round game, and that would have matched my final ranking in 2023 and 2024.

I started the April 19, 2025 Columbus G/60 tournament poorly, losing in the first round to Colin Park (1708 published rating, 1788 live rating, 1839 post-tournament rating), who then won his second round game as well before losing in the last round to top seeded Evan Fan (2047). I bounced back to win my next two games to tie for second-third, but I still lost nine rating points to drop my rating to 1992.

I scored 2.5/4 in the April 26, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado. I lost my last round game on board one to Alex Cretsos, who won the tournament with 4/4. Cretsos gained 50 rating points establish a new career-high rating (2020), and I lost seven rating points to drop my rating to 1985. The next day, I scored 3/4 in the April 27, 2025 East Market Swiss, tying for second-third. I started 3/3 before losing to top seeded Deshawn Kelley in the last round. I gained 14 rating points to lift my rating to 1999.

My performance in the May 3, 2025 Columbus Plus Score tournament was a very disappointing setback. I made an unsound sacrifice versus Peyton Legg (1765) and lost in the first round, bounced back to win two games, and then blundered in the last round versus Daniel Chancey (1903). I lost 26 rating points to drop my rating to 1973. My slump continued the next weekend when I scored 2/4 in the May 11, 2025 East Market Swiss, losing 15 rating points to drop my rating to 1958. I scored 3/3 in the Dayton Chess Club's May 17, 2025 G/45 "A" Quad, gaining 12 rating points to improve my rating to 1970.

Unfortunately, I lost all 12 rating points--and much more--when I scored 2.5/7 in the U2100 section of the Chicago Open during Memorial Day Weekend. In the U2100 section of the 2024 Chicago Open, I scored 4/7 and only lost once, but this year I lost four games, including two to players rated below 1800, and my rating plummeted 52 points to 1918--my lowest rating since I hit my rating floor (1900) on March 31, 2021. My last round opponent had a published rating of just 1524, but before he beat me he defeated two players rated over 1900; he gained 193 rating points in this tournament, and he is now rated 1717. My tournament consisted of a series of tragicomedies (to borrow Mark Dvoretsky's word to describe a game gone awry), but perhaps the most tragic and comic was my lone draw, my third round game during which I had a losing position before my opponent hung a piece. I seemed to be cruising to victory when he played ...Ne6, after which he slapped his forehead as if he just realized he had blundered another piece:

Any sensible move wins easily for me here--but I let my guard down, and did not ask myself the most important question about any chess position: "What does my opponent want?" Here, he wants me to create a potential stalemate if I take his N with my Q. A few seconds after I gave him what he wants by playing Qxe6, he played ...Rxg3+. I have to take the R to avoid a perpetual check, after which my opponent forces me to take his Q and thus stalemate his K. I delayed the inevitable by playing Kh2, after which my opponent played ...Rh3+ and offered a draw--twice. By this point, I felt embarrassed at my carelessness and frustrated with his theatrics--the head slap, followed by multiple draw offers when it is obvious that the draw is unavoidable. I don't blame my opponent for playing on in a completely lost position; there is no rule against playing on until checkmate--but the head slap and the multiple draw offers were a bit much for me to take. I played the game out until stalemate appeared on the board. Normally, after every game I wish my opponent good luck in his next game, but after this game I said, "You had a resignable game but you are resourceful. The head slap was a nice touch. Congratulations on the best game of your career." I am not proud of making that semi-sarcastic dig, but I am not ashamed either; drawing me with Black probably is the best result he has had in his chess career. I am still not sure who is the bigger clown: my opponent for his "Three Stooges" theatrics after he played ...Ne6, or me for being foolish enough to let my guard down at any time, let alone in a game in the biggest tournament that I play in each year.

After the Chicago Open's fifth round, I scored 3.5/10 in the Chicago Open Blitz, including 1/6 versus players rated above 2100 and 2.5/4 versus players rated below 2100. There were 55 players in the Open section and 66 players in the U1900 section. 

I enjoy the "big time" environment of the Chicago Open, and I feel blessed to have played in the event 15 times, even though this one did not turn out the way that I had hoped or planned. I remain undaunted; after I hit my rating floor on March 31, 2021, I pushed my rating back over 2000 four tournaments later, on April 17, 2021. As I have always done, I lick my wounds, study my games, and prepare for the next tournament. Bill Belichick once very famously said, "We're on to Cincinnati," and that was literally the case for me--my next tournament was the May 31, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado. I started out with 2.5/3 and could have tied for first place with a last round win, but I lost to Evan Fan (2063) to finish out of the money and lose two rating points to drop to 1916.

I scored 3/5 in the U2100 section of the Cleveland Open to gain five rating points to improve to 1921. The good news about that result is that I did not lose a game, scoring one win and four draws; the bad news about that result is that I stood better in three of the four games that I drew, so if I had played more precisely I would have won more games and gained more rating points. The highlight of this tournament is that my daughter Rachel played in the Cleveland Open for the first time and she played in a two day weekend Swiss event for the second time. Rachel received a first round bye and then lost an "extra" rated game played during the first round. She fought hard throughout the tournament, facing higher rated players each round, and even though she lost all of her games she enjoyed the experience. It was a great Father's Day weekend for us!

Rachel and me before the first round of the 2025 Cleveland Open

Rachel and I played in the June 28, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado, the fifth time that we have played in this monthly event run by Robert Chenault. I scored 3/4 to finish third-fifth in the Open section, gaining 15 points to push my rating to 1936, and splitting the U2001 prize with one other player. Top seeded Aryan Balyan (2258 post-tournament rating) claimed clear first with 4/4, beating me in round three before defeating FM Hans Multhopp in the fourth round. Rachel scored 0/3 with a one point bye in the fourth round, but she had a great time, and she played an extra unrated game for fun during the fourth round.

Rachel and me prior to arriving at the June 28, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado

I started the second quarter of 2025 well, pushing my rating to 2015 after the April 6, 2025 East Market Swiss, but I lost 83 rating points in May before bouncing back to regain 20 rating points in June. 

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 12, I listed four chess goals for 2025. Here are those goals, with notes about how I have performed in the first two quarters of 2025:

1) Gain 50 rating points per quarter. I lost 16 rating points in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing my rating from 2013 to 1997; I lost 61 rating points in the second quarter of 2025, decreasing my rating from 1997 to 1936. 

2) Do not lose more than six games to players rated below 1800. I lost five games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2025; I lost four games to players rated below 1800 in the second quarter of 2025.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had nine draws and 14 losses in the first quarter of 2025; I had nine draws and 15 losses in the second quarter of 2025.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .750, to break my personal record of .740 set in 2014. My winning percentage through the first two quarters of 2025 is .648. 

In 2025, I have scored 61 wins, 18 draws, and 29 losses in regular rated tournament games with three first place finishes in 27 events. I lost nine games to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2025 is -77, so I need to gain 264 points to reach my goal. 

Journey to the National Master Title, Part 13

I scored 2/4 in the January 4, 2025 Columbus Plus Score tournament. I lost 16 rating points to drop to 1997. This is the eighth time I have played in a Columbus Plus Score event, and the third time that I did not achieve a plus score (but I also have never had a minus score). I squandered an easily winning endgame in the first round due to hasty, inaccurate play. In the diagram below, I am about to play my 42nd move, and Stockfish 17 says that I have a nearly +7 advantage.

There are many paths to victory, but perhaps the simplest is what I initially planned: pushing my e pawn, and if Black checks me then I can run my K up the board, using my R and P for shelter if necessary. However, I became concerned that Black's g pawn could become dangerous if Black uses his K and R to take my f pawn and g pawn while my e pawn runs. So, I decided to be "safe" and take the g pawn--but now my K has no shelter, so Black can either check me forever, or else be just in time to pick off all of my pawns. A couple moves later, my opponent blundered and gave me a second chance to push my e pawn under favorable circumstances, but after I missed that winning opportunity the game fizzled to a draw; turning a win into a draw represents a 12 point rating swing, and in order to regain those points at my current rating level I would have to win one game against a 2000 rated player or two games against an 1800 rated player. Chess can be brutal!

How can a strong and experienced player make such a mistake? Ignoring for a moment the reality that even world champions blunder because blunders are an inherent part of chess, this specific mistake reflects a larger weakness that I need to correct: I too often rely on a combination of my general chess knowledge and my intuitive feel for chess positions as opposed to doing move by move calculation. My general chess knowledge states that a player who is up two pawns wins trivially the vast majority of the time, and my intuitive feel for chess positions led me to believe that capturing the g pawn eliminated Black's last practical drawing chance--but move by move calculation would have enabled me to see that White is winning after 42. e4 Ra2+ 43. Ke3 Ra3+ 44. Kd4 Ra4+ 45. Ke5 g4 46. Rf4. Black's g pawn will fall, and my K and R will escort the e pawn down the board, as Black's K is cut off and I can evade R checks.

Although the tournament was not a success, I ended the event on a positive note; in the fourth round, I beat Mehmet Yilanli, the highest rated seven year old in the United States (1880), avenging my loss to Yilanli in the fourth round of the October 5, 2024 Columbus Plus Score tournament. 

I scored 3/4 in the January 5, 2025 East Market Swiss, gaining nine rating points to bounce back over 2000 (2006), and tying for second-fourth. I won my first three games before losing to top seeded Broderick Bauml in a last round battle for first place. 

As soon as I popped my head above 2000, I crashed below again by losing 19 rating points in the Columbus Winter Open to slip to 1987. I reached a winning position in the first round versus Maxwell Chung (1783) only to dissipate my advantage with inaccurate moves before doing an unsound piece sacrifice; instead of a quick win, I suffered my first loss of 2025 versus a player rated below 1800. I won my next two games but then lost to Aryan Balyan (2162) in a last round battle for second place.

I scored 2/3 in the Dayton Chess Club's January 18, 2025 G/45 Swiss, losing 10 rating points to drop to 1977. Although I did not perform as well as I expect to perform in this event, in the first round I delivered a pretty checkmate versus two-time Dayton Chess Club Champion David Guehl. I do not recall ever seeing this exact pattern before; it is interesting that my Q could be replaced by a B or even by a P and it would still be a checkmate because my opponent's K is hemmed in by his own Ps:

I scored 2/4 in the January 19, 2025 East Market Swiss, losing 19 rating points to fall to 1958. In the last round, with second place up for grabs, I lost to Keya Jha (1934), the second highest rated 10 year old girl in the country; she already ranks on the 95th percentile of all players nationwide! She finished clear second behind John Miller (2049), the top ranked player who beat me in the third round en route to a 4-0 performance. 

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 9, I described the history of the Cardinal Open, and I explained why it is one of my favorite tournaments. I tied for second-third among players rated under 2200 in the strong Open section of the 1999 Cardinal Open, highlighted by beating 13 year old National Master A.J. Steigman in the last round. Last year, I scored just 2.5/5 in the U2100 section. This year, I started with 2/3 on Saturday, putting myself in position to win a prize and gain rating points with two wins on Sunday. After the third round, I played in the Cardinal Open Saturday Night Blitz, scoring 5/8 to tie for first-second U2000 in the Open section. I scored 1.5/2 versus players who hold the NM title, including an exciting last round win versus Savio Bennihyn Joseph Benher, who has a 2231 regular rating. In the main event on Sunday, I beat my friend Robert Chenault (1906) in the fourth round, but I lost to Srihari Kandadai in a last round game on board two; as a result, Kandadai tied for first place with 4.5/5, but if I had won that game then I would have tied for second. Kandadai gained 139 rating points, vaulting from 1803 to 1942. I lost one rating point, dropping my rating to 1957.

I scored 3/4 in the February 1, 2025 Columbus Plus Score tournament, gaining 14 rating points to improve my rating to 1971. This is sixth time I achieved a plus score in nine appearances at this event. In the last round, I defeated Magnolia Zhu (1747), the fifth highest rated eight year old girl in the country. I was the eighth highest rated player in a strong field that included National Masters Will Sedlar (top scorer with 3.5/4), Jonathan Hilton, and Brett Passen, but I tied for second-fourth with Hilton and Expert Nicholas Bize. Sedlar defeated me in round two.

The February 15, 2025 Columbus G/60 tournament had an "Adults Only" (age 18 and up) format. Many adults prefer to not face young players, particularly young players who are not only strong but also underrated. I don't duck anybody at any time, but I wish that the U.S. Chess Federation would follow FIDE's example by adjusting the ratings of players rated under 2000 to reflect the obvious deflation that has happened in recent years. In the first round, I faced Pranav Jayaganesh, a young player who is still a "junior" according to the U.S. Chess Federation but who qualified for this "Adults Only" event because he is older than 18 and graduated from high school. I obtained an opening advantage plus a huge lead on the clock, but I did not cash in and my opponent offered me a draw twice in the endgame. Both times that he offered a draw the position was equal, but I convinced myself that I could induce him to make a time pressure error. Eventually, I sacrificed a pawn to create complications. With best play, he would have been forced to sacrifice back to maintain equality--but, instead, I blundered in his time pressure:

Here, 66.Kb5 maintains a narrow path to equality: 66...Bxh4 67.c4 Bf2 68.Kxa5 h4 69.Kb5 Kg5 70.c5 Bxc5 71.Kxc5 Kf4 72.a5 Kf3 73.a6 h3 74.a7 h2 75.a8Q h1Q 76.Qa6 Kf4 77.Qxf6 Qxf1 78.Qh6+ Kxe4 79.f6 Qf2+ 80.Kd6 g3 81.Qh7+ Ke3 82.Qa7+ Kf3 83.Qxf2+ gxf2 84.f7 f1Q 85.f8Q+ Ke2 86.Qxf1+ Kxf1 87.Kxe5=. Unfortunately, I played 66.Kd5?? and lost after 66...Bxh4 67.c4 Bf2 68.c5 h4 69.c6 Bb6 70.Kd6 Kg5 71.c7 Bxc7+ 72.Kxc7 h3 73.Kd6 Kh4 74.Ke6 g3. I played the game continuation because I missed how fast Black's pawns are after 73...Kh4. I hastily assumed that if Black's K abandons f6 then my pawn would roll through. I remember NM Jim Jordan asserting "If you can count, you can become a Master." That still seems like an exaggeration to me, but this position is a great example of how important it is to count/calculate accurately. Jayaganesh finished with 2/3, gaining 32 rating points. I won my last two games to finish with 2/3, but I lost five rating points, dropping my rating to 1966.

I tied for first-third U2000 in the February 22, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado, scoring 3/4. I lost one rating point, dropping my rating to 1965. I was the fifth seed in the 29 player Open section, and I was the only player seeded in the top five to win a prize. The next day, I completed a full chess weekend by scoring 2.5/4 in the February 23, 2025 East Market Swiss. I lost nine rating points, dropping my rating to 1956. I was the third seed out of 23 players. Only one of the top three seeded players won a prize. Shiv Srinivasan won the event with 3.5/4 after beating me and the second seeded player in rounds three and four respectively, and he gained 89 rating points to push his rating to 1865; this is the third time this year that I lost to a player rated below 1800 (and the second time that the sub-1800 player who beat me had a post-tournament rating above 1800). I missed several forced wins (and some forced draws) versus Srinivasan. Here is my last chance before I blundered and handed the win to him:

Srinivasan had just played 54.Kc4, getting out of check and renewing the mate threat on g7. I should have played 54...f6, which blocks my opponent's B while opening up f7 for my B and freeing my Q to swing over to d1. Stockfish 17 says that Black is nearly +5 here, meaning that my advantage is equivalent to being ahead by a R. Instead, I hallucinated that my opponent could get a perpetual check by sacrificing his R on f6 if I pushed the pawn, so I played 54...Qh6?? My opponent replied 55.g4, threatening both to deflect my Q with 56.g5 and to pin my Q with 56.Rh2. I can parry both threats by playing either 55...f6 or 55...Rd1--but because I did not notice the Rh2 threat I played 55...Be4?? and I thought that I had caught White's K in a mating net. I was deflated and discouraged when my opponent played 56.Rh2, a move which may look spectacular to a novice but is in fact a simple deflection tactic that I should have seen as soon as my opponent opened his second rank by pushing his g pawn. I had an advantage for a substantial portion of this game, but posterity will record the result as 1-0; there are no rating points or prizes awarded for "almost winning" or "winning for most of the game." 

Over 20 years ago, I asked Grandmaster Edmar Mednis how to consistently convert winning positions/how to avoid blundering away winning positions, and he told me to think of a chess game as equivalent to taking a five hour car trip: if you drive safely for four and a half hours but then crash into a ditch that is not a successful car trip; similarly, if you dominate your opponent for most of the game but then blunder, that is not a successful chess game. The car trip/chess game is not over until you safely reach your desired destination. I remember Mednis' story but remembering it is not enough: I must apply this wisdom when the outcome of the game hangs in the balance. It is not enough to be a good storyteller. I asked Mednis the question not to have a pithy pearl of wisdom to share, but to obtain practical advice to use during my games.

I scored 3/4 in the March 1, 2025 Columbus Plus Score tournament. This is the seventh time I achieved a plus score in 10 appearances at this event. I gained seven rating points, lifting my rating to 1963. I was the seventh seeded player, but I tied for second-sixth behind rising young Expert Siddarth Kunapuli. In the last round, I defeated National Master Brett Passen, the top seeded player. Two of the top three seeded players did not finish with a plus score, which indicates how competitive this tournament was.

I followed up my solid Columbus Plus Score result by winning the March 8, 2025 Columbus G/60 tournament with 2.5/3. I gained 14 rating points to improve my rating to 1977. The combined ages of my three opponents was significantly less than my age, and I am proud that I am showing that "Generation X" players can still compete with talented "Generation Alpha" players. On March 9, 2025, I scored 3/4 in the East Market Swiss, tying for second-fourth but losing seven rating points to drop my rating to 1970. I played ...Nxh3 in two games--the first time, I sacrificed unsoundly and lost to Stanley Qiu (1790) in the second round, but the second time my attack versus veteran Columbus player Thomas Stafa (1859) crashed through successfully.

Here is the position prior to my 29th move versus Qiu:

 

I stand clearly worse here, so I went for it with ...Nxh3+. I captured two pawns for my N, and I had ideas of lifting the Rf8 and swinging the other R to the f file, but White's Q, B, and R are putting too much pressure on my K. I lost after 30.gxh3 Qxh3 31.Qg2 Qxc3 32.Ne3 Rf4 33.Qg6 Rf6 34.Qxh5 Qd3 35.Rfd1 Rg6+ 36.Ng4 Qe4 37.Rb8+ Bf8 38.Rxf8+ Kxf8 39.Qh8+ Ke7 40.Qe8#.

Here is the position prior to my 30th move in my fourth round game versus Stafa. My pieces are swarming around Stafa's K, and after ...Nxh3 I won quickly: 31.Bxh3 Qxf2+ 32.Ng2 Nf4 33.Qf3 Rxh3+ 34.Rxh3 Qxf3.

I scored 3.5/4 in the March 16, 2025 East Market Swiss, claiming clear first while gaining 15 rating points to push my rating to 1985--but the highlight of the event was spending the day with my daughter Rachel, who drew her first round game despite not playing in any tournaments since the December 28, 2024 Cincinnati Tornado (where I also scored 3.5/4, finishing first-second). Rachel and I enjoyed Yellow Brick cheese pizza during the lunch break after the second round, and she also had a brownie batter sundae from NOLA Daq Shack.

Pre-tournament selfie with Rachel at March 16, 2025 East Market Swiss

The March 29, 2025 Cincinnati Tornado was my final tournament of the first quarter of the year. I scored 3/4 to finish clear second, gaining 12 rating points to increase my rating to 1997. In the third round, I drew Will Sedlar (2341), and thus I earned the "Master Bounty" prize paid out to a player who defeats or draws with the event's top seeded player.

I started the first quarter of 2025 horribly--losing 57 rating points in January--but I finished strongly, gaining 41 rating points in March. In five March tournaments I finished first twice and second three times while scoring 15/19 with just two losses--but both losses were to players rated below 1800, which means that a great month could have been even better. The blown winning positions described earlier in this article represent the difference between being rated over 2050 now versus being rated 1997; the rating points are there for the taking, but I have to take them by consistently converting winning positions. 

In Journey to the National Master Title, Part 12, I listed four chess goals for 2025. Here are those goals, with notes about how I have performed so far this year:

1) Gain 50 rating points per quarter. I lost 16 rating points in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing my rating from 2013 to 1997. 

2) Do not lose more than six games to players rated below 1800. I lost five games to players rated below 1800 in the first quarter of 2025.

3) Accumulate more draws than losses. I had nine draws and 14 losses in the first quarter of 2025.

4) Maintain a winning percentage of at least .750, to break my personal record of .740 set in 2014. My winning percentage in the first quarter of 2025 was .681.

In 2025, I have scored 35 wins, nine draws, and 14 losses in regular rated tournament games with two first place finishes in 15 events. I lost five games to players rated below 1800. My net rating gain for 2025 is -18, so I need to gain 205 points to reach my goal.