Monday, May 1, 2023

Ding Liren is the New World Chess Champion After Defeating Ian Nepomniachtchi in Rapid Tiebreak

Ding Liren defeated Ian Nepomniachtchi 2.5-1.5 in the Rapid Tiebreak to win the World Chess Championship title abandoned by Magnus Carlsen, whose reign lasted from 2013-2023 and included four successful title defenses. Carlsen is still the highest rated chess player (2853) in the world, followed by Nepomniachtchi (2794) and Ding (2789). Nepomniachtchi qualified for the 2023 World Chess Championship match by winning the Candidates Tournament for the second time in a row. Ding finished second in the Candidates Tournament after beating the highest rated American player (Hikaru Nakamura, ranked fifth in the world with a 2775 rating) in the last round, but Ding was elevated to fellow challenger status with Nepomniachtchi after Carlsen declined to participate.

The vast majority of games in the Classical portion of recent World Chess Championship matches were draws, but six of the 14 games in the Classical portion of the Ding-Nepomniachtchi match were decisive. Perhaps the key moment in the Classical portion of the match happened when Ding won game 12 to tie the score at 6-6. Nepomniachtchi enjoyed a promising position in game 12 but he lost the thread while trying to win, and then threw away the game with a major mistake that he played after using very little time on his clock. In retrospect, that was the turning point: Ding trailed from game seven until he won game 12, but after game 12 Nepomniachtchi did not win another game. The players drew the final two Classical games and the first three Rapid Tiebreak games, so Ding's first lead in the World Chess Championship came when he won the fourth game of the four game Rapid Tiebreak and immediately became the World Champion!

It is a heartbreaking result for Nepomniachtchi, who was a few accurate moves away from all but clinching the title in game 12, and it was a magnificent triumph for Ding, the first Chinese player among the 17 undisputed World Chess Champions since Wilhelm Steinitz assumed the throne in 1886 (unofficially, Steinitz' reign at the top of the chess world dates back to 1866, but there was not a formal World Chess Championship match prior to 1886).

In public, Ding has an unassuming, low key demeanor that can be misinterpreted. Every time Ding lost a game, armchair psychologists examined Ding's body language and proclaimed that he was a broken person who could not recover from such a devastating setback. This made little sense, because a person does not become the third ranked chess player in the world and qualify to play in a World Chess Championship match without having great mental toughness and strength of character. The in-game commentators provided valuable insights relating to the moves played, but it is disappointing that people who ask idiotic questions at press conferences receive media credentials. No one needs to ask Ding Liren how he ranks his self-confidence on a scale of 1-10, nor does anyone need to ask Nepomniachtchi if the match is over when there are three games left in the Classical portion (a question that sounded stupid at the time, and aged very poorly after Nepomniachtchi lost in the Rapid Tiebreak).

This match featured more decisive games than recent matches not because the players are better (or worse) than the players from other World Chess Championship matches, but because this match featured a fascinating clash of personalities and playing styles. Thus, when one player steered the game toward his type of position, he tended to win, and vice versa. In such a match, it is easy to nitpick and to criticize the players' moves; it is important to remember that even if a chess computer evaluates a position as objectively equal that does not mean that the path to maintain equality is obvious to a human: there are equal positions in which any sensible move retains the balance, and there are equal positions in which one player has to walk a delicate tightrope involving many "only" moves, some of which may not be intuitive or obvious to a human.

It should also be mentioned that deciding the World Chess Championship in a Rapid Tiebreak is similar to breaking a tie in a marathon with a series of sprints: a marathon and a sprint both involve running, but they are different sports. Classical chess--chess played at slow time controls--is one sport, and rapid chess is a different sport. There is actually a separate event to determine the world champion at rapid time controls. There is no perfect format for a World Chess Championship: a match extending until one player wins a set number of games with draws not counting led to the marathon 1984-85 Karpov-Kasparov match in which play was eventually suspended with the outcome undecided after 48 games, while letting the champion retain the title in a drawn match has its drawbacks as well. It would be nice to see a Classical match format lasting longer than 14 games.

All of that being said, the players signed contracts and agreed to the format, so it cannot be said that one player was at a disadvantage: both players knew that if they drew the Classical portion of the match then the title would be determined in a Rapid tiebreak (with a Blitz tiebreak to follow if the Rapid tiebreak was drawn).

Turning our attention back to the just concluded World Chess Championship, it is no secret that Nepomniachtchi often plays too quickly, and it is clear that this trait has been costly for him at times. I respect Grandmaster Anish Giri for candidly stating early in the match that when he mentions this flaw in Nepomniachtchi's approach he understands that Nepomniachtchi must be doing a lot of things very well to win back to back Candidates Tournaments. Giri said that he has greater flaws in his game to iron out than Nepomniachtchi has in his game, and that explains why he (Giri) has never played in a World Chess Championship match. Such humility and self-awareness are great traits for other commentators to cultivate.

Congratulations to Ding, and best wishes to Nepomniachtchi, who is young enough and good enough to still contend for the World Chess Championship.

2 comments:

Eric said...

David,

Wonderful recap. This is the same Eric who regularly reads and comments on 20 Second Timeout.

I thought Ding's resolve and mental fortitude were beyond exemplary in this match. The games themselves were fascinating to watch especially seeing the decisive games and even some of the draws. I don't think there will ever be a "perfect" way to devise a classical chess format that will satisfy all contestants, players, and viewers. It is a tricky format to organize, but Ding absolutely earned this brilliant comeback for his first WCC title.

I personally find it tiring seeing online comments disrespecting both Ian and Ding in this particular WCC because Magnus isn't defending it. Magnus choosing not to defend his title is his choice; I don't believe he has really anything to prove to the chess world at this point, although I would have loved to see him try to continue in defending his title as WCC champion until someone beat him. I go on social media and see inane comments like "I won't respect whoever wins this 2023 WCC because Magnus isn't defending it" or "these two players have made so many inaccuracies in these games." Everyone is a chess expert and master when watching a game with a computer engine right next to them. Casual viewers and amateurs who have no clue what they're talking about overly rely on engine analysis in a position in a middlegame or endgame and think they're some experts.

That being said, all kudos to both Ding and Ian for a fascinating and highly entertaining WCC match. Much respect to Ding for being the first male champion to represent China.

David Friedman said...

Eric:

Thank you! I enjoy commenting about chess, and correcting misconceptions about chess.

I agree with you that Magnus' decision should not impact how this match is viewed. Magnus has a right to decline to participate, and the natural next step is for a new World Champion to be crowned. The new World Champion is 100% legitimate as the World Champion. Being World Champion and being the highest rated player are two different things. The highest ranked tennis player does not always win Wimbledon, and the team with the most wins does not always win the NBA title, World Series, Super Bowl, or Stanley Cup.

After Fischer declined to defend his title in 1975 and Karpov became World Chess Champion by virtue of beating Korchnoi in the Candidates Final, Karpov won a string of tournaments to solidify his status as the top active player. It will be interesting to see if Ding does something similar; if he doesn't that does not diminish the value of winning the World Chess Championship, but if he does he can further enhance his status and his place in history.